benefitsattorney.com
State Taxes and Married Same-Sex Couples
(Posted
on September 17, 2013 by Carol V. Calhoun)
The Internal Revenue Service has now announced that same-sex
couples married in a jurisdiction that permits such marriages will be treated as
married for federal tax purposes, even if they live in a jurisdiction that does
not recognize such marriages. But what about such couplesf recognition as
married for purposes of state income taxes? The question is of concern not only
to individuals, but to their employers which must determine proper state income
tax withholding. In addition, employers which are in many instances expanding
spousal coverage for same-sex partners under employee benefit plans will need to
know the characterization of such coverage for purposes of state taxes. Many
would no doubt assume that whether a state will treat couples as married for tax
purposes depends on whether it would recognize their marriages generally.
However, that may not necessarily be the case.
The issue arises because most states use a
federal definition of income (either federal adjusted gross income or federal
taxable income) for purposes of calculating state income taxes. Before the
Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, this raised the issue of
whether same-sex spouses would be barred from filing joint state income tax
returns, even in states that recognized their marriage, due to the fact that
federal law precluded them from filing joint federal income tax returns and
state law required conformity between state tax law and federal tax law. The Comptroller of Maryland followed this reasoning in asserting
that married same-sex couples in Maryland would need to file state income tax
returns as single (before the Defense of Marriage was struck down), even after
Maryland recognized their marriages. Similarly, even after New York
recognized same-sex marriages, New York married same-sex couples had to file
their New York state taxes as if they were single, until the problem was
corrected by statute. And even after New
Mexico began recognizing same-sex marriages, the instructions for the New Mexico personal income tax
return stated, gUse the same filing status on your state return that you
used on your federal return,h without providing any exception for same-sex
married couples.
Legally married same-sex couples will now file federal returns (and calculate
federal adjusted gross income and federal taxable income) using either joint
filing status or married filing separately status. Thus, the question arises
whether married same-sex couples may use such status at the state level, even in
states that do not otherwise recognize their marriages.
The chart below shows the extent of the potential issues. In the following
states (Group 1), the issue of treating same-sex couples as married for state income tax
purposes does not arise, either because the state has no income tax or because
the state does not provide a separate rate structure for single and married
taxpayers:
- Alaska
- Colorado
- Florida
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Massachusetts
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- Pennsylvania
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Wyoming
In the following states (Group 2), same-sex married couples will now file state taxes
as married, either due to interpretations of specific state statutes or
constitutional provisions, or due to conformity with federal filing status:
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Hawaii
- Iowa
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Minnesota
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- Oregon
- Rhode Island
- Vermont
In the following states (Group 3), same-sex marriage is not recognized and there is no
conformity between federal and state taxes, so same-sex married couples will
have to file as if they were single:
- Alabama
- Arkansas
- Michigan
- Mississippi
The following states (Group 4) do not recognize same-sex marriage, civil unions, or
domestic partnerships, but conform to federal tax law, and thus will arguably
need to allow same-sex married couples to file joint state income tax returns:
- Arizona
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- South Caolina
- Virginia
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
Obviously, the situation in this last group of states is the most fluid. In
some of them (shown as gfixed dateh in the chart below), only provisions in the
Internal Revenue Code as of a specific date are incorporated into state tax law.
Frequently, the state legislature in such states annually amends its laws to
incorporate a new date. It remains to be seen whether the next such legislation
will explicitly carve out an exception under which same-sex married couples will
be required to file state tax returns as single. (Of course, such legislation
could also be enacted in states that provide for automatic incorporation of
Internal Revenue Code provisions, but there is not such an obvious vehicle for
it.) It is also possible that in some states, regulatory authorities will take
the position that state constitutional or statutory provisions precluding
recognition of same-sex marriage will override the normal conformity between
federal and state tax laws.
Clearly, it is critical that same-sex married couples and their tax advisers
keep abreast of developments in their state tax law. It would be a mistake
either to assume that all states will automatically follow federal law in
permitting same-sex married couples to file as married, or to assume that such
filing status will be available only in those states that recognize same-sex
marriage generally.
State Tax Rules for Same-Sex Couples |
STATE |
Conformity With Internal Revenue Code |
Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships |
ALABAMA |
no conformity |
none |
ALASKA |
no state income tax |
none |
ARIZONA |
fixed date |
none |
ARKANSAS |
no conformity |
none |
CALIFORNIA |
fixed date |
same-sex marriage |
COLORADO |
no separate rates for couples |
civil unions |
CONNECTICUT |
rolling |
same-sex marriage |
DELAWARE |
rolling |
same-sex marriage |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
rolling |
same-sex marriage |
FLORIDA |
no state income tax |
none |
GEORGIA |
fixed date |
none |
HAWAII |
fixed date |
civil unions |
IDAHO |
fixed date |
none |
ILLINOIS |
no separate rates for couples |
civil unions |
INDIANA |
no separate rates for couples |
none |
IOWA |
fixed date |
same-sex marriage |
KANSAS |
rolling |
none |
KENTUCKY |
fixed date |
none |
LOUISIANA |
rolling |
none |
MAINE |
fixed date |
same-sex marriage |
MARYLAND |
rolling |
same-sex marriage |
MASSACHUSETTS |
no separate rates for couples |
same-sex marriage |
MICHIGAN |
no separate rates for couples |
none |
MINNESOTA |
fixed date |
same-sex marriage |
MISSISSIPPI |
no conformity |
none |
MISSOURI |
rolling |
none |
MONTANA |
rolling |
none |
NEBRASKA |
fixed date |
none |
NEVADA |
no state income tax |
domestic partnerships |
NEW HAMPSHIRE |
tax imposed on interest & dividends only; no separate rates for
couples |
same-sex marriage |
NEW JERSEY |
no conformity |
civil unions |
NEW MEXICO |
rolling |
unclear whether same-sex marriage can be performed in New Mexico;
opinion of Attorney General states that New Mexico will recognize same-sex
marriages from other states |
NEW YORK |
rolling |
same-sex marriage |
NORTH CAROLINA |
fixed date |
none |
NORTH DAKOTA |
rolling |
none |
OHIO |
rolling |
not permitted in Ohio; some court decisions have recognized same-sex
marriages from other states |
OKLAHOMA |
rolling |
none |
OREGON |
rolling |
domestic partnerships |
PENNSYLVANIA |
no separate rates for couples |
none |
RHODE ISLAND |
rolling |
same-sex marriage |
SOUTH CAROLINA |
fixed date |
none |
SOUTH DAKOTA |
no state income tax |
none |
TENNESSEE |
tax imposed on interest & dividends only; no separate rates for
couples |
none |
TEXAS |
no state income tax |
none |
UTAH |
no separate rates for couples |
none |
VERMONT |
fixed date |
same-sex marriage |
VIRGINIA |
fixed date |
none |
WASHINGTON |
no state income tax |
same-sex marriage |
WEST VIRGINIA |
fixed date |
none |
WISCONSIN |
fixed date |
limited domestic partnerships, which do not include right to file
taxes as married |
WYOMING |
no state income tax |
none |
2.
Although Michigan does not have a separate rate structure for married couples,
marital status is nevertheless used in determining the number of exemptions, the
taxability of employer-provided health care, and the like. And
MCL 206.311 states as follows:
Taxpayers who are husband and wife and who file a joint federal
income tax return pursuant to the internal revenue code shall file a joint
return.
Since the statute requires that taxpayers be husband and wife under Michigan
law, as well as filing a joint federal return, it appears that same-sex married
couples will be precluded from filing a joint Michigan state income tax
return.
3.
gRollingh means the state tax is based on the current version of the Internal
Revenue Code. gFixed dateh means the state income tax is based on the Internal
Revenue Code as it existed on some historical date chosen by the state
legislature.
Although Michigan does not have a separate rate structure for
married couples, marital status is nevertheless used in determining the number
of exemptions, the taxability of employer-provided health care, and the like.
And
MCL 206.311 states as follows:
Taxpayers who are husband and wife and who file a joint federal
income tax return pursuant to the internal revenue code shall file a joint
return.
Since the statute requires that taxpayers be husband and wife under Michigan
law, as well as filing a joint federal return, it appears that same-sex married
couples will be precluded from filing a joint Michigan state income tax
return.
gRollingh means the state tax is based on the current version of
the Internal Revenue Code. gFixed dateh means the state income tax is based on
the Internal Revenue Code as it existed on some historical date chosen by the
state legislature.